The Great Game of Business 800.386.2752

The Great Game of Business Blog

Sign up to receive our blog posts conveniently in your email box

Can Equity Ownership be the Ultimate Stake in the Outcome?

Aug 8, 2019 by Martin Staubus 0 Comments

Can Equity Ownership be the Ultimate Stake in the Outcome?

We all know the fundamental building blocks of the Great Game of Business®:

  • Know and teach the rules
  • Follow the action and keep score
  • Provide a Stake in the Outcome®

When it comes to that third step—providing a stake in the outcome—what’s the best way to do that? Two common choices include cash bonuses and equity sharing.

Many owners, especially those new to the Game, are skittish about sharing equity with employees. They can’t always put their finger on why it makes them nervous, but the reality is that using equity interests can be a great way to provide a stake in the outcome to your associates.

Paying out cash bonuses on a regular basis consumes cash that might otherwise be available to use on marketing efforts, new product development, or capital investments to support growth, so it's important to remember that cash is always a limited resource that has to be managed carefully. While options like profit sharing help to align interests, sharing in annual profits is not the same as a long-term equity interest

Great Game practitioners that share equity ownership have seen that the interests of your employees will now be fully aligned with yours. But, is there real evidence of the effectiveness of equity sharing? Does it change how employees think about their company and, in turn, how they do their jobs? Yes indeed. More than 30 studies over the past 20 years have addressed the question of how employee ownership affects firm performance.  So, what does the research show?

The jury is in: companies that establish employee stock programs experience a boost in business performance. A 2004 study found that companies that established employee stock plans saw an average increase in their return on assets of 5.5%, an increase in their net profit margin of 10.3%, and an increase in their return on equity of 5.6%.  Looking at the data from all of these studies combined, the average estimated productivity difference between companies that share equity and those that don’t was 6.2%.

And consider: how does Jack Stack and SRC Holdings provide a stake in the outcome?  You guessed it—stock is distributed to all the employees of the company.  Says Jack: “Companies that don’t share equity are making a mistake.” Equity sharing may not be the best option for every company, but it is worth a serious look.

 


To learn more about ESOPs and better understand the challenges and options for owner exit planning, see what Martin Staubus has to share in his session at the 27th annual Gathering of Games.

New call-to-action


 

Other Articles You Might Like:

 

Topics: Employee Ownership, The Annual Gathering of Games, Gathering 2019 Speaker

Martin Staubus
Written by Martin Staubus

Martin Staubus is the executive director of the Beyster Institute (part of the Rady School of Management at UC San Diego) where he advises companies on the use of ESOPs and other stock plans.  The Institute was established by entrepreneur Bob Beyster, who grew his start-up venture into a Fortune 500 company. 

About The Great Game of Business

Our approach to running a company was developed to help close one of the biggest gaps in business: the gap between managers and employees. We call our open-book approach The Great Game of Business. What lies at the heart of The Game is a very simple proposition: The best, most efficient, most profitable way to operate a business is to give everybody in the company a voice in saying how the company is run and a stake in the outcome. Let us teach you how to develop a culture of ownership, where employees think, act and feel like owners.